.png)
G O O G L E :
''' DATA DILEMMA DATE '''
WELCOME TO !WOW! : WELCOME TO HUMANITY. FOR a great beginning, allow me the honour to say that : The World Students Society is doing spectacularly A-OK Globally.
One esteemed Founder, on behalf of the Global Founder Framers, gave me a unique presentation and analysis of !WOW!'s Meta Data. Leaving no element of !WOW!'s sterling performance on country, sector, segment, region and global basis.
I ventured to suggest to him - that every few months or so, to have these charts, pie-charts, breakups, displayed on the sidebars of !WOW!. This optical display would transform every Parent, Student, Professor and Teachers' life the world over.
DATA CASE STUDY : ON THE WORLD STUDENTS SOCIETY - the Global Founder Framers - and the students of the world, should be paying very, very close attention to all Data related happenings, news, laws, and verdicts.
My opinion and advice to you all is to get the best lawyerly and legal minds to focus on Data related issues for !WOW!. Say, somebody of the class and background of European lawyer, Zainab Khan, King's College, U.K.
Consider and think that a data dilemma hovers in the Google search case. Any decision to break its grip on the internet could reset competition online.
DATA PLAYED A STARRING ROLE in the government's successful antitrust suit against Google accusing it of illegally protecting its monopoly in online search.
Now, steps to force Google to unlock its data trove could figure prominently in a ruling on how to address the tech giant's dominance, antitrust experts say.
Some weeks ago, the federal judge overseeing the case, Amit P. Mehta, heard closing arguments in federal court in Washington on what corrective measures, known as remedies, he should order to restore competition.
The government's requests include forcing Google to share its search engine results and advertising data with rivals.
U.S. Justice Department lawyers have repeatedly described data as '' the oxygen '' for search engines. And in his ruling against Google in August, Judge Mehta recounted in detail how the company harvests vast amount of data from user searches and web crawling, then stores and analyses the data to rule the lucrative market for internet search.
Google, he noted, collects nine times as much user search data every day as all its rivals combined. And as more data is fed into Google's software, the results that the search engine returns on everything from biology to bluejeans become more accurate and relevant to the person seeking information.
Better search performance, in turn, attracts more users and more advertisers, Judge Mehta wrote. It's a flywheel that steadily enhances Google's search and acts as a barrier to competition.
'' At every stage in the search process,'' the judge wrote, '' user data is a critical input that directly improves quality.''
His decision on how to fix Google's monopoly has the potential to reshape competition on the internet, particularly as a new age of generative artificial intelligence takes off and is expected to overhaul the way people search for information online.
Tech companies are racing to win consumers over with chatbots and other tools that can answer sophisticated questions, drawing from vast pools of data.
Judge Mehta has already indicated that A.I. may factor into his deliberations, noting during a recent hearing the rapid development of the technology since the lawsuit went to trial in the fall of 2023.
To fix Google's search monopoly. the Justice Department and the group of states that brought the case have recommended a range of sanctions, from simply prohibiting anticompetitive deals with companies that Google pays to make it the automatic search engine to forcing the company to sell off its market-leading Chrome browser.
The government's data-related proposal falls somewhere in between. It includes requiring Google to share user search information and license its search index, a database of hundreds of billions of web pages scored by popularity, quality and relevance.
In late April, Judge Mehta said he looked at his job as weighing actions across a '' remedy spectrum. '' At one end was a breakup order, he said, while at the minimalist end was a ban on illegal deals with browser and smartphone companies.
In the middle were '' forward-looking'' remedies, he said, without elaborating on his thinking.
Still, a data sharing project raises its own set of questions. In court testimony, Google emphasized the privacy concerns of passing user search data along to other companies.
The government's data proposal also calls for access to software that uses data as an ingredient but was built by Google's engineers.
'' It looks like an administrative - how much data, how often, and access to Google's crown jewel ?'' said John Yun, an economist in the Antonin Scalia Law School at George Mason University in Virginia.
This Master Publishing continues. The World Students Society thanks Steve Lohr.
With respectful dedication to the Global Founder Framers of The World Students Society, and then Parents, Students, Professors and Teachers.
See You all prepare for Great Global Elections on !WOW! - the exclusive and eternal ownership of every student in the world : wssciw.blogspot.com and Twitter X !E-WOW! - The Ecosystem 2011 :
Good Night and God Bless
SAM Daily Times - The Voice Of The Voiceless
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Grace A Comment!