UN'S COURT JURISDICTION ON IRAN

THE UNITED STATES told UN Judges this Tuesday they had no jurisdiction to rule on Tehran's demand for them to order the suspension of debilitating nuclear-related sanctions against Iran.

Iran has argued that US President Donald Trump breached a 1955 treaty with his decision to impose to reimpose the sanctions after withdrawing from a multilateral nuclear accord.

But the US State Department lawyer Jennifer Newstead told the court in The Hague that it ''lacks prima facie jurisdiction to hear Iran's claims.''

But Newstead argued that the United States had the right to protect its national security and other interests.

The treaty ''cannot therefore provide a basis for the court's jurisdiction'' in the case, she said.

The United States and several other world powers lifted sanctions on Iran under a 2015 accord after years of diplomacy. In return, Tehran made commitments not to seek to build nuclear weapons.

Trump said the 2015 accord did not do enough to curb the threat from Iran. He pulled out of the accord in May, and began reimposing sanctions this month.

In the first day of the hearings at the ICJ on Monday,  Iran's lawyers said the sanctions were threatening the welfare of the citizens and disrupting  tens of billions dollars worth of  business deals. [Agencies]