NEW YORK (AP) — Facebook is spending $1 billion to buy the photo-sharing company Instagram in the social network's largest acquisition ever.
On the surface, that's a huge sum for a tiny startup that has a handful of employees and no way to make money.
But
the lack of a business model rarely dampens excitement about hot tech
upshots these days. As Facebook has shown, itself without ads or revenue
in its early days, money goes where the users are.
Instagram
lets people share photos they snap with their mobile devices. The app
has filters that can make photos look as if they've been taken in the
1970s or on Polaroid cameras. Its users take photos of everything from
their breakfast egg sandwiches to sunsets to the smiling faces of their
girlfriends.
In a little more
than a year, Instagram attracted a loyal and loving user base of more
than 30 million people. Apple picked it as the iPhone App of the Year in
2011.
Instagram's fans, brand
recognition and its potential are difficult to put a price tag on. Yet
Facebook has — and can afford it. The company is preparing for an
initial public offering of stock that could value it at as much as $100
billion in a few weeks. What's $1 billion? A drop in the bucket, really.
"Facebook
after this IPO is going to be in a position to be predatory. They can
make sure no one steps in their way and buy anyone who gets in their
way," said Wedbush analyst Michael Pachter, who follows social media.
Buying Instagram, he added, not only eliminates a rival but gives Facebook the technology "that is gaining crazy traction."
Facebook
is paying cash and stock for San Francisco-based Instagram and hiring
its dozen or so employees. The deal is expected to close by the end of
June.
It's a windfall not just
for Instagram's employees, but the venture capital firms backing the
company. Last week, Sequoia Capital led an investment round that valued
Instagram at $500 million, according to a person familiar with the
matter. The person was not authorized to speak publicly and spoke on the
condition of anonymity.
Going
by the $1 billion price tag, Facebook is paying about $33 for each
Instagram user. That's a fraction of the $118 that Facebook investors
will be paying per Facebook user if the company gets its expected $100
billion valuation after going public. By that math, Pachter said, $1
billon "doesn't sound crazy."
Getting
Instagram is a big win for Facebook as it works to harness people's
growing obsession with their mobile devices and sharing every moment of
their life. The company's own mobile application is not as easy to use
as Instagram, and sharing photos can be downright clunky. Facebook's
way, noted Pachter, has always been to buy technology if it's better
than what it can build on its own.
Facebook,
which is based in Menlo Park, Calif., said it plans to keep Instagram
running independently. That's a departure from its tendency to buy small
startups and integrate the technology — or shut them down altogether
just so it can hire talented engineers and developers.
"This
is an important milestone for Facebook because it's the first time
we've ever acquired a product and company with so many users," CEO Mark
Zuckerberg wrote on his Facebook page Monday announcing the deal. "We
don't plan on doing many more of these, if any at all."
He
said Facebook plans to keep allowing people to post from Instagram to
other social networks. Users will also be able to keep their Instagrams
off of Facebook if they want to.
"We
think the fact that Instagram is connected to other services beyond
Facebook is an important part of the experience," Zuckerberg said.
Tech bloggers and analysts immediately began wondering whether Facebook's commitment will be eternal.
"There's
a long history of companies acquiring other companies and saying that
they are going to continue to support the service — and then not," said
Debra Aho Williamson, an analyst with research firm eMarketer.
One
relatively recent example is Cisco Systems Inc., which killed off the
much-loved Flip video camera less than two years after buying the
company behind it.
There were
some mutterings online about users leaving Instagram now that Facebook
has bought it, though in reality Facebook will probably make it more
popular.
There's a good reason
for Facebook to keep Instagram going as a separate product, even if
Facebook integrates some of its technology into its own service so that
mobile photo sharing becomes easier. Google, for example, has kept
YouTube separate even as it integrated some of its features into other
products.
"Look at who Facebook
is competing with — the Googles, Apples, Microsofts of the world. They
have to build a strong brand and strong consumer platform," Gartner
analyst Brian Blau said. "Having a separate social network ... is
something they needed to do a long time ago."
Source: Yahoo

0 comments:
Post a Comment
Grace A Comment!