2/29/2012

How Subverting The Immune System Shapes The Arms Race Between Bacteria And Hosts

Why is it that Mycobacterium tuberculosiscan cause tuberculosis with as little as 10 cells, whereas Vibrio cholerae requires the host to ingest up to tens of millions of cells to cause cholera? This is the question that two research teams, from the Pasteur Institute, in France, and the Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciencia and the University of Lisbon, in Portugal, answer in the latest issue of the journal PLoS Pathogens. The researchers show that bacteria that are able to invade and/or destroy cells of the host's immune system have higher infectivity, whereas those that are more motile, multiply faster and communicate with each other are less infectious, that is, it takes more bacterial cells to trigger an infection. These findings help understand the patterns that shape infectivity of bacteria, and contribute to more accurate predictions of how emerging pathogens may evolve, with implications for public health. 

Despite the multitude of mechanisms that pathogens use to exploit its human host, the research teams of Eduardo Rocha, in France, and Francisco DionĂ­sio, in Portugal, set out to find common themes in the mechanisms used by distantly related bacteria. The researchers trawled through scientific literature on 48 bacterial pathogens. They related several bacterial features (motility, interactions with the immune system, growth rate) with their value of ID50 - the minimum number of bacterial cells that is required to trigger an infection in 50% of infected hosts. 

The teams found that bacteria that are able to destroy or subvert phagocytes - the cells of the immune system that engulf bacteria - have ID50 of around 250 cells. The remaining bacteria, meanwhile, have ID50 values of around 30 million - they are much less infectious. These bacteria rely on high turnover (or growth), are very motile, and are capable of communicating with other bacteria, through the mechanism of quorum-sensing. 


Read More

Scott Parker appointed as England captain



Scott Parker's appointment as England captain ahead of Steven Gerrard divides opinion

Stuart Pearce's decision to name Scott Parker as England captain ahead of frontrunner Steven Gerrard has divided opinion ahead of tonight's game against Holland.
Parker, the Tottenham midfielder, will lead the team out at Wembley despite the presence of Gerrard - Liverpool captain and England's most experienced player - in the squad.
QPR midfielder Joey Barton was the most vocal critic of Pearce's decision, describing his reaction as "speechless."
The 31-year-old has excelled since his summer move from West Ham to Tottenham and has been one of the key figures in his club's push for the Premier League title.
Formerly captain at West Ham, Parker has in the past been hailed for his inspirational team talks, most notably by Carlton Cole last season when West Ham came back from 3-0 down to draw with West Brom as they battled for Premier League survival.
Cole was quoted as saying "If you were there you would have had a tear in your eye" after the half time team talk.
Parker was also crowned England's 2011 player of the year.

Amla, Morkel steer South Africa to series win


Amla plays a cover drive
Napier: A 92 from Hashim Amla guided South Africa to victory, chasing 230 set by New Zealand after the Kiwis middle order failed, in the 2nd ODI as the tourists seal the series.
After winning the toss, South Africa invited New Zealand to bat first. Martin Guptill (58) and McCullum (85) gave the hosts a strong start with their107-run partnership for the 2nd wicket, but after Tsotsobe dismissed the top order Morne Morkel, who took 5 wickets for just 38, took the charge and was on a hat-trick twice. At the end of their innings, New Zealand had lost eight wickets for 67

South Africa's chase was bright from the start despite Jacques Kallis departed early. Amla (92) progressed along with middle order batsmen to reach the target within 39 overs with a loss of 4 wickets.
Score Card



New Zealand innings (50 overs maximum)
RMB4s6sSR
View dismissalRJ Nicollbw b Tsotsobe1127172064.70
View dismissalMJ Guptillc †de Villiers b Kallis58108738079.45
View dismissalBB McCullum*†c Ontong b Tsotsobe851259611288.54
View dismissalKS Williamsonc Kallis b Tsotsobe1335180072.22
View dismissalJD Ryderc †de Villiers b Steyn0162000.00
View dismissalJEC Franklinb M Morkel618151040.00
View dismissalAM Ellisc Steyn b M Morkel1954300163.33
View dismissalKD Millsc Peterson b M Morkel021000.00
View dismissalTG Southeec Steyn b M Morkel28292722103.70
View dismissalTS Nethulac †de Villiers b M Morkel021000.00
AJ McKaynot out0105000.00
Extras(lb 5, w 5)10
Total(all out; 47.3 overs; 213 mins)230(4.84 runs per over)
Fall of wickets 1-24 (Nicol, 6.1 ov), 2-131 (Guptill, 24.6 ov), 3-163 (Williamson, 32.3 ov), 4-175 (McCullum, 34.1 ov),
5-179 (Ryder, 35.1 ov), 6-184 (Franklin, 37.4 ov), 7-184 (Mills, 37.5 ov), 8-221 (Southee, 45.2 ov),
 9-221 (Nethula, 45.3 ov),10-230 (Ellis, 47.3 ov)
BowlingOMRWEcon
View wicketsLL Tsotsobe1004334.30(1w)
View wicketDW Steyn1013713.70(2w)
View wicketsM Morkel9.313854.00
JA Morkel3030010.00
RJ Peterson804305.37(2w)
View wicketJH Kallis603215.33
JP Duminy10202.00
South Africa innings (target: 231 runs from 50 overs)RMB4s6sSR
View dismissalHM Amlac †McCullum b Nethula9213810712085.98
View dismissalJH Kallisc †McCullum b Mills41251080.00
View dismissalF du Plessisc Guptill b Ellis34382560136.00
View dismissalJP Duminyc & b Nethula43623960110.25
AB de Villiers*†not out3158352088.57
JL Ontongnot out1732193089.47
Extras(b 2, lb 2, w 6)10
Total(4 wickets; 38.2 overs; 170 mins)231(6.02 runs per over)
Did not bat JA Morkel, RJ Peterson, DW Steyn, M Morkel, LL Tsotsobe
Fall of wickets 1-11 (Kallis, 2.5 ov), 2-80 (du Plessis, 11.3 ov), 3-167 (Duminy, 25.6 ov), 4-192 (Amla, 31.4 ov)
BowlingOMRWEcon
View wicketKD Mills6.214116.47(1w)
TG Southee806107.62
AJ McKay1014504.50
View wicketAM Ellis301615.33
View wicketsTS Nethula1006026.00(1w)
RJ Nicol10404.00


Score Card from ESPN